<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia and Nofollow: The Anti-Spam Technique That Turned Evil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/</link>
	<description>The Internet Startup Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vance</title>
		<link>http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-6976</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/#comment-6976</guid>
		<description>I guess I don&#039;t have a problem with the nofollow tags in comment sections, but when it&#039;s used to prevent page rank when outbound links ADD VALUE to a site... well, that sucks, especially if the outbound page is burning up bandwidth on that traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I don&#8217;t have a problem with the nofollow tags in comment sections, but when it&#8217;s used to prevent page rank when outbound links ADD VALUE to a site&#8230; well, that sucks, especially if the outbound page is burning up bandwidth on that traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Freeman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The porn of Web2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-2203</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Freeman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The porn of Web2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/#comment-2203</guid>
		<description>[...] do this even though it hurts the blogs that use it (if pagerank is important to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do this even though it hurts the blogs that use it (if pagerank is important to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Adsense Blog Makes Money &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I have been leaving comments on other blogs, and I have been, in some cases, leaving links to to my site.</title>
		<link>http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-1823</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Adsense Blog Makes Money &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I have been leaving comments on other blogs, and I have been, in some cases, leaving links to to my site.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/#comment-1823</guid>
		<description>[...] Wikipedia and Nofollow: The Anti-Spam Technique That Turned Evil [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wikipedia and Nofollow: The Anti-Spam Technique That Turned Evil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>It would be a pretty tempting tag if I had a website. =P

If this gets to a point where google becomes a bad search engine, I&#039;m sure google will find a way to work around it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be a pretty tempting tag if I had a website. =P</p>
<p>If this gets to a point where google becomes a bad search engine, I&#8217;m sure google will find a way to work around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plugim.com</title>
		<link>http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>plugim.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 04:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playingwithwire.com/2007/02/wikipedia-and-nofollow-the-anti-spam-technique-that-turned-evil/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wikipedia and Nofollow: The Anti-Spam Technique That Turned Evil...&lt;/strong&gt;

An article about Wikipedia, nofollow and the Search Engine Optimization implications. From the post, &quot;Because of their invisible property, nofollow is the ultimate page rank retaining technique. If a site went ahead and put nofollow on every single ex...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wikipedia and Nofollow: The Anti-Spam Technique That Turned Evil&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>An article about Wikipedia, nofollow and the Search Engine Optimization implications. From the post, &#8220;Because of their invisible property, nofollow is the ultimate page rank retaining technique. If a site went ahead and put nofollow on every single ex&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
